by Brose, U., Blanchard, J. L., Eklöf, A., Galiana, N., Hartvig, M., R. Hirt, M., Kalinkat, G., Nordström, M. C., O’Gorman, E. J., Rall, B. C., Schneider, F. D., Thébault, E. and Jacob, U.
Published: 12 January 2016
Understanding the consequences of species loss in complex ecological communities is one of the great challenges in current biodiversity research. For a long time, this topic has been addressed by traditional biodiversity experiments. Most of these approaches treat species as trait-free, taxonomic units characterizing communities only by species number without accounting for species traits. However, extinctions do not occur at random as there is a clear correlation between extinction risk and species traits. In this review, we assume that large species will be most threatened by extinction and use novel allometric and size-spectrum concepts that include body mass as a primary species trait at the levels of populations and individuals, respectively, to re-assess three classic debates on the relationships between biodiversity and (i) food-web structural complexity, (ii) community dynamic stability, and (iii) ecosystem functioning. Contrasting current expectations, size-structured approaches suggest that the loss of large species, that typically exploit most resource species, may lead to future food webs that are less interwoven and more structured by chains of interactions and compartments. The disruption of natural body-mass distributions maintaining food-web stability may trigger avalanches of secondary extinctions and strong trophic cascades with expected knock-on effects on the functionality of the ecosystems. Therefore, we argue that it is crucial to take into account body size as a species trait when analysing the consequences of biodiversity loss for natural ecosystems. Applying size-structured approaches provides an integrative ecological concept that enables a better understanding of each species’ unique role across communities and the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss.
biodiversity; extinctions; complexity; food webs; stability; ecosystem functioning; global change; allometric scaling; size spectrum
- Kalinkat, G., Schneider, F.D., Digel, C., Guill, C., Rall, B. C., Brose, U. (2013), Body masses, functional responses and predator–prey stability, Ecology Letters, 16:1126–-1134
- Schneider, F.D., Scheu, S. & Brose, U. (2012), Body mass constraints on feeding rates determine the consequences of predator loss, Ecology Letters, 15:436–443
- Schneider, F.D., Brose, U. (2013), Beyond diversity: how nested predator effects control ecosystem functions, Journal of Animal Ecology, 82:64–71 (pdf)
- Schneider, F.D., Scheu, S. & Brose, U. (2014), Corrigendum to Schneider, Scheu & Brose (2012) DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01750.x, Ecology Letters, 17:1339–1340 (pdf)
- Schneider, F. D., Brose, U., Rall, B. C., Guill, C. (2016), Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs, Nature Communications, 7:12718 (pdf)