Current Research
Biodiversity and society
In my current work projects, I am interpreting biodiversity from a systemic point of view that assumes that individual organisms form populations and communities in complex interactions and by doing so, produce ecosystem functions and services that are of interest to human wellbeing. Vice versa, anthropogenic pressures such as land use change and climate change are going to affect ecosystem functions only via affecting individual interactions in the first place. I am involved in projects within the framework of the Biodiversity Exploratories, which investigate trait composition at the community level.
The role that science takes in the process of negotiating biodiversity values are key. In my collaboration with ISOE, Frankfurt, and the linguistics department at TU Darmstadt, I am looking into the ways of knowledge transfer from scientific communities into the public.
Collaborators
Markus Fischer, Pete Manning, Nico Blüthgen, Nina Janich, Alexandra Lux
Relevant publications
- Mangels, J., Fiedler, K., Schneider, F. D., Bluethgen, N. (2017), Diversity and trait composition of moths respond to land-use intensification in grasslands: generalists replace specialists, Biodiversity and Conservation, 26 14:3385-3405 doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1411-z
- Schneider, F. D., Brose, U., Rall, B. C., Guill, C. (2016), Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs, Nature Communications, 7 :12718 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12718 (pdf)
Catastrophic Shifts in Drylands
The CASCADE project1 investigates sudden regime shifts in dryland ecosystems, particularly in the Mediterranean. Arid ecosystems are suffering from climatic and anthropogenic pressures. Those combined stressors can lead to the permanent loss of vegetation. My PostDoc in Montpellier was dedicated to the development of models that reproduce these shifts. Such models serve the evaluation of indicators of early warning as well as the development of sustainable land use strategies.
Many landscapes in the mediterranean are intensely grazed by sheep or goats. We developed a model to estimate how grazing in addition to abiotic effects changes the face of a landscape in terms of vegetation cover and patch structure. The cellular automata model is based on a model of local facilitation developed by Sonia Kéfi2. Previous landscape approaches on the effect of grazing used a rather abstract conception. Grazing intensity was defined to increase individual plant mortality linearly. In nature, the grazing pressure on an individual plant depends on the vegetation cover non-linearly (functional response). The precise shape of this non-linear function depends on many things, like the foraging behaviour and body mass of the grazers, but in rangelands, also on the management decisions of the shepperd and the governance regime of the region. We are aiming at a conceptional framework that allows a meaningful translation between model and metrics of land use management.
Collaborators
Sonia Kéfi, Alain Danet, Mara Baudena, Max Rietkerk, Susanna Bautista, Luuk Fleskens, Diana Sietz
Relevant publications
- Danet, Alain, Florian D. Schneider, Fabien Anthelme, Sonia Kéfi (2020), Indirect facilitation drives species composition and stability in drylands, Theoretical Ecology, doi: 10.1007/s12080-020-00489-0
- Alexandre Génin, Sabiha Majumder, Sumithra Sankaran, Florian D. Schneider, Alain Danet, Miguel Berdugo, Vishwesha Guttal, Sonia Kéfi (2018), Spatially heterogeneous stressors can alter the performance of indicators of regime shifts, Ecological Indicators, 94 :520-533 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.071 (pdf)
- Alexandre Génin, Sabiha Majumder, Sumithra Sankaran, Alain Danet, Vishwesha Guttal, Florian D. Schneider, Sonia Kéfi (2018), Monitoring ecosystem degradation using spatial data and the R package spatialwarnings, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9 :2067-2075 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13058 (pdf)
- Schneider, F.D., Kéfi, S. (2015), Spatially heterogeneous pressure raises risk of catastrophic shifts, Theoretical Ecology, 9 2:207-217 doi: 10.1007/s12080-015-0289-1 (pdf)
- van den Elsen, Erik, Lindsay C. Stringer, Cecilia De Ita, Rudi Hessel, Sonia Kéfi, Florian D. Schneide, Susana Bautista, Angeles G. Mayor, Mara Baudena, Max Rietkerk, Alejandro Valdecantos, Victoriano R. Vallejo, Nichola Geeson, C. Jane Brandt, Luuk Fleskens, Lia Hemerik, Panos Panagos, Sandra Valente, Jan J. Keizer, Gudrun Schwilch, Matteo Jucker Riva, Diana Sietz, Michalakis Christoforou, Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis, Christiana Papoutsa, Giovanni Quaranta, Rosanna Salvia, Ioannis K. Tsanis, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Heleen Claringbould and Peter C. de Ruiter (2020), Advances in Understanding and Managing Catastrophic Ecosystem Shifts in Mediterranean Ecosystems, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.561101 (pdf)
- Code release for article "Spatially heterogeneous pressure raises risk of catastrophic shifts" by Florian D. Schneider & Sonia Kéfi
- R-package caspr: running spatial disturbance models in a cellular automata framework by Alain Danet, Alex Genin, Vishwesha Guttal, Sonia Kefi, Sabiha Majumder, Sumithra Sankaran, Florian Schneider (Maintainer)
Predator diversity and ecosystem function
Many aspects of predation can be estimated from the species’ average individual body mass. This allows the prediction of quality and quantity of interaction strengths in natural food webs. The network approach bridges the physiological properties of individuals and dynamic interactions within complex, multi-predator communities and provides a mechanistic view on ecosystems.
This simplification is quite radical but incredibly useful. Since body mass is quite easy to measure in the field or in experiments, this allows us to interpolate known physiological or ecological properties for any species. For instance, we can estimate a species’ food uptake, it’s movement speed or guess it’s role in the food chain. By making these rough assumptions, we can even project the dynamic development of an entire community over time or estimate the importance of particular species or their risk of extinction. Of course not to the point and not with absolute certainty, but more universal and with less effort than with any other method.
Collaborators
Ulrich Brose, Christian Guill, Gregor Kalinkat, Björn C. Rall
Relevant publications
- Brose, U., Blanchard, J. L., Eklöf, A., Galiana, N., Hartvig, M., R. Hirt, M., Kalinkat, G., Nordström, M. C., O'Gorman, E. J., Rall, B. C., Schneider, F. D., Thébault, E. and Jacob, U. (2016), Predicting the consequences of species loss using size-structured biodiversity approaches, Biological Reviews, 92 2:684-697 doi: 10.1111/brv.12250
- Kalinkat, G., Schneider, F.D., Digel, C., Guill, C., Rall, B. C., Brose, U. (2013), Body masses, functional responses and predator–prey stability, Ecology Letters, 16 :1126–-1134 doi: 10.1111/ele.12147
- Schneider, F.D., Scheu, S. & Brose, U. (2012), Body mass constraints on feeding rates determine the consequences of predator loss, Ecology Letters, 15 :436–443 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01750.x
- Schneider, F.D., Brose, U. (2013), Beyond diversity: how nested predator effects control ecosystem functions, Journal of Animal Ecology, 82 :64–71 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12010 (pdf)
- Schneider, F.D., Scheu, S. & Brose, U. (2014), Corrigendum to Schneider, Scheu & Brose (2012) DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01750.x, Ecology Letters, 17 10:1339–1340 doi: 10.1111/ele.12333 (pdf)
- Schneider, F. D., Brose, U., Rall, B. C., Guill, C. (2016), Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs, Nature Communications, 7 :12718 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12718 (pdf)
- Code release for Schneider et al. "Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs" by Florian D. Schneider & Christian Guill
-
CASCADE is funded by the Framework Programme 7 of the European Comission. ↩
-
Kéfi, S., M. Rietkerk, M. van Baalen & M. Loreau. 2007. Local facilitation, bistability and transitions in arid ecosystems. Theoretical Population Biology. 71(3): 267-400. ↩